Strategic governance insights: KPIs, KRIs, and KCIs

17 min read
Apr 24, 2024 2:48:12 PM

The essence of strategic governance lies in the ability to balance performance management with risk oversight and control assurance. Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), Key Risk Indicators (KRIs) and Key Control Indicators (KCIs) each play a distinct role in this process. The integration of these indicators creates a comprehensive framework that not only measures success but also ensures it is achieved sustainably and responsibly. 

At the core of effective corporate governance lies the ability to set strategic direction, monitor execution and adjust the course as necessary. KPIs are instrumental in this process, offering quantifiable data on how effectively the company is progressing towards its predetermined targets, such as revenue growth, market share expansion, customer satisfaction, and operational efficiency. By providing a clear measure of success, KPIs enable board directors to assess whether the organisation is on the right path and to make informed decisions regarding strategic adjustments.

However, strategic direction and performance monitoring are only part of the governance puzzle. This is where KRIs come into play, serving as early-warning signals that allow boards to anticipate and mitigate risks proactively. KRIs help in identifying financial, operational, regulatory and strategic risks, providing an opportunity for pre-emptive action to mitigate these risks before they impact the organisation adversely. KRIs extend the board’s vision beyond immediate performance metrics, offering insights into the potential roadblocks or challenges that could derail the organisation’s strategic journey.

Equally important are KCIs, which provide assurance regarding the effectiveness of the organisation’s control environment. In ensuring that risks are adequately managed and that strategic objectives are pursued within an acceptable risk framework, KCIs play a pivotal role. They offer a lens through which the board can assess whether the controls in place are sufficient, effective and aligned with the organisation’s risk appetite and strategic goals. They measure the strength and efficiency of internal processes, policies and mechanisms in preventing, detecting and correcting issues that could lead to risk realisation. KCIs are indicative of the robustness of an organisation’s governance and compliance framework.

In practice, the interplay between KPIs, KRIs and KCIs facilitates enhanced decision-making by boards. By monitoring KPIs, management can identify areas where performance is lagging, necessitating a review of associated KRIs to understand if underlying risks may be influencing these outcomes. Subsequently, evaluating relevant KCIs can determine whether existing controls are effective or if adjustments are needed to address the identified risks and improve performance.

A good way to understand the interplay between KPIs, KRIs, and KCIs is to use the analogy of a person undertaking a journey by car. 


Understanding KPIs

Embarking on a journey requires a clear destination. This destination represents the strategic objectives of an organisation – the ultimate goals it aims to achieve. Before setting out, a traveller plans their route, identifying key milestones along the way. These milestones are akin to KPIs in a business setting.

KPIs are measurable indicators that reflect the critical success factors of an organisation. Unlike ordinary metrics, KPIs are directly tied to strategic objectives, offering insights into the organisation’s performance at various levels—from operational efficiency and customer satisfaction to financial health and market positioning. The power of KPIs lies in their ability to convert abstract strategic goals into concrete, measurable targets, enabling boards to track progress in real-time and make informed decisions - just as milestones on a journey give you insight into how far you’ve travelled and how close you are to your destination.

KPIs serve a number of additional functions for a board including:

  • Helping boards ensure that the organisation's strategy is being implemented at all levels effectively. They provide a clear set of metrics that align with the organisation's strategic goals, enabling boards to monitor progress and make adjustments as needed.
  • Offering a quantitative basis for assessing the company's performance over time. By evaluating these indicators, boards can identify areas of success and areas requiring improvement, facilitating informed decision-making.
  • Serving as a common language for the board, management, and stakeholders, ensuring that all parties have a unified understanding of what success looks like. This clarity enhances transparency and fosters an environment of accountability. 
  • Providing critical data that support board decisions on a wide range of issues, from financial planning and budget allocation to operational adjustments and strategic pivots. By grounding decisions in concrete data, KPIs help boards navigate complex business landscapes with confidence. 

The nature and focus of KPIs can vary significantly across industries, reflecting the unique challenges and success factors of each. Here are a few examples:


Production volume: measures the quantity of units produced over a specific period, indicating the efficiency and capacity of production processes.

Defect rate: tracks the percentage of products with defects out of the total production volume, reflecting the quality control effectiveness. 

Equipment downtime: monitors the amount of time production equipment is not operational, affecting overall productivity.


Sales revenue: tracks the total income generated from goods sold, indicating the overall financial performance of the retail business.

Inventory turnover: measures how often inventory is sold and replaced over a certain period, reflecting inventory management efficiency and sales effectiveness.

Customer retention rate: monitors the percentage of customers who continue to buy from the retailer over time, indicating customer satisfaction and loyalty.

Average transaction value: calculates the average amount spent per customer transaction, providing insights into consumer buying behaviour and pricing strategies. 

Gross margin: measures the percentage of total sales revenue that the company retains after incurring the direct costs associated with producing the goods it sells, reflecting profitability.

On-time delivery rate: measures the percentage of orders delivered to customers on time, indicating the efficiency of the production and distribution processes.

Untitled (1200 x 628 px) (2)

The alignment of KPIs with organisational goals is foundational to their effectiveness. This alignment ensures that the organisation’s efforts and resources are focused on the areas of greatest strategic importance. To achieve this alignment, boards should:

1. Start by clearly defining the organisation’s mission, vision and strategic objectives. This provides the framework within which KPIs are selected;
2. Identify the current performance levels and compare them with the desired strategic outcomes. This analysis helps pinpoint the areas where KPIs are most needed;
3. Engage a broad range of stakeholders in the KPI selection process, including board members, executives, and team leaders. This ensures a comprehensive understanding of strategic priorities and operational realities; and
4. Regularly review organisation’s KPIs to ensure they remain aligned with evolving strategic objectives and continue to provide relevant insights.

KPIs are not set in stone; they evolve as an organisation grows and as its strategic objectives shift. This dynamic nature of KPIs necessitates ongoing review and adjustment. Organisations must remain agile, ready to refine their KPIs in response to internal changes, such as operational improvements or strategic pivots, and external factors, like market shifts or regulatory changes. 

Navigating through KRIs

As with any journey, unforeseen challenges can arise. Weather conditions, roadblocks or detours can disrupt even the best-laid plans. In addition, a flat tyre, running out of oil or running out of fuel could spell disaster for a journey. In the context of an organisation, these potential disruptions can be predicted by KRIs. 
 Untitled (1200 x 628 px)
KRIs are metrics designed to signal potential risks before they fully materialise, allowing Boards to pre-emptively address threats. Unlike KPIs, which focus on performance benchmarks, KRIs are predictive in nature, focusing on the probability and impact of future events. Their importance lies in their ability to provide a forward-looking perspective on risk, enabling organisations to implement mitigation strategies proactively rather than reactively. This foresight is crucial for maintaining strategic direction and safeguarding organisational assets and reputation.
By identifying these risks early, the organisation can take pre-emptive action to mitigate them, much like a traveller might change their route on receiving a storm warning, or filling up with petrol, ensuring they can continue their journey safely and efficiently.
The essence of effective risk management lies not just in identifying what has gone wrong but also in anticipating potential challenges before they impact the organisation. KRIs are instrumental in this context, serving several critical functions:
  • KRIs act as an early warning system, highlighting risk exposures that are trending unfavourably before they escalate into more significant issues. This function allows board and management to take corrective action early, potentially avoiding adverse outcomes; 
  • By monitoring KRIs, boards can continually identify and assess new and emerging risks, ensuring that their risk management strategies are comprehensive and up to date;
  • KRIs provide vital information that supports strategic decision-making, enabling the board and management to consider potential risks when planning and executing the organisation’s strategy; and
  • Effective use of KRIs fosters communication and alignment around risk management objectives, engaging various levels of the organisation in a unified approach to risk mitigation.
Examples of KRIs:
Patient readmission rates: tracks the rate at which patients are readmitted to a hospital after discharge, indicating the quality of care and potential financial penalties under certain healthcare regulations.
Staffing levels: monitors the ratio of healthcare staff to patients, as inadequate staffing can lead to increased errors, patient safety risks and staff burnout.
Information technology
System downtime and availability: tracks the frequency and duration of system outages, reflecting the reliability of IT systems and the potential impact on business operations.
Cloud service provider downtime: monitors the reliability of third-party cloud services, as downtime can significantly impact operations, particularly for businesses reliant on cloud computing.
Untitled (1200 x 628 px) (1)
For board directors, implementing KRIs in an effective way involves several key steps:
1. Conducting a thorough risk assessment to identify the specific risks that could impede the organisation’s strategic objectives. This process should consider both internal and external factors, including operational, financial, regulatory and reputational risks.
2. Engaging with stakeholders across the organisation to gain diverse perspectives on potential risks and their impact.
3. For each identified risk, selecting indicators that can serve as reliable predictors of potential issues. KRIs should be closely linked to the underlying risk factors and capable of signalling changes in risk exposure.
4. Clearly defining what each KRI measures, how it will be calculated and the thresholds or limits that will trigger action.
5. Ensuring that KRIs are integrated into the organisation’s overall governance and risk management framework. This includes establishing processes for monitoring, reporting and responding to KRIs.
6. Developing a reporting mechanism that brings KRIs to the attention of the board and senior management in a timely and efficient manner, enabling swift action when necessary.
7. Implementing a system for continual monitoring of KRIs to ensure they provide an up-to-date view of the organisation’s risk exposure.
8. Regularly reviewing and adjusting KRIs as necessary to reflect changes in the organisation’s strategy, risk profile, or external environment.
Incorporating KRIs into the strategic oversight functions of the board offers several advantages. Firstly, it enhances the organisation’s agility, allowing it to respond to emerging risks swiftly and effectively. Secondly, it supports informed decision- making, ensuring that risk considerations are integrated into strategic planning and execution. Finally, it contributes to the development of a risk-aware culture, where risk management is viewed as a shared responsibility and an integral part of achieving an organisation’s strategic objectives. 

The role of KCIs in governance

Preparation and the ability to navigate safely through challenges are essential for a successful journey. In this analogy, the vehicle’s safety features and navigation aids represent KCIs as do service records/logbooks outlining time/distance since the last oil change, timing cam belt replacement, brake wear, or tyre rotation. Just as a car’s brakes, steering system or GPS help navigate through storms or find alternative routes around roadblocks, and log books help ensure the cars is serviced/checked at regular intervals, KCIs assess the effectiveness of an organisation’s controls its processes, policies and systems designed to manage and mitigate risks. 
KCIs provide quantitative and qualitative data on how well these controls are functioning, offering insights into areas such as compliance, operational efficiency and risk mitigation. The role of KCIs in governance is multifaceted, extending from assurance of control effectiveness to enhancement of strategic decision-making and risk management.
Untitled (1200 x 628 px) (3)
One of the primary roles of KCIs is to provide assurance to the board and senior management that internal controls are operating as intended. This assurance function is critical, as it directly impacts the organisation’s ability to manage risks effectively, comply with regulatory requirements and achieve its strategic objectives. By regularly monitoring KCIs, boards can identify weaknesses in the control environment before they lead to significant issues, ensuring that the organisation remains on a secure and compliant path.
Beyond their role in assurance, KCIs also drive continual improvement within the organisation’s control environment. By highlighting areas where controls are not performing optimally, KCIs enable management to take corrective actions, refine processes, and enhance control mechanisms. This ongoing process of evaluation and improvement is essential for adapting to changes in the business landscape, regulatory requirements and risk profiles.
KCIs perform numerous functions for a board including:
  • Enabling boards to monitor the effectiveness of internal controls in managing risks, ensuring that the controls are functioning as intended and mitigating risks appropriately.
  • Identifying areas where controls may be overly stringent or not stringent enough, allowing for adjustments that balance risk management with operational efficiency.
  • Ensuring that the organisation complies with relevant laws, regulations and standards by tracking controls related to compliance requirements. This is crucial in avoiding legal penalties and maintaining a good corporate reputation.
  • Gaining insights into the strengths and weaknesses of their current risk management strategies, enabling them to make informed decisions about where to allocate resources to bolster defences.
  • Providing boards with critical information on how well the organisation’s controls are supporting its strategic objectives. This information is vital for strategic planning, as it highlights potential areas of vulnerability that could hinder the achievement of strategic goals. 
Controls are the mechanisms an organisation puts in place to address the risks identified by KRIs. They can be preventive or detective in nature. Preventive controls aim to stop adverse events before they happen, similar to how anti-lock brakes (ABS) prevent skidding in wet conditions and how regular servicing can pick up bald tyres before they cause an issue on the road. Detective controls, on the other hand, identify and correct issues after they have occurred, much like a GPS rerouting you following after a wrong turn or a sensor telling you a fuse has blown or that the diesel particulate filter is clogged. KCIs measure how well these controls are working, ensuring they are adequate to deal with potential hazards and keep the organisation on its path towards achieving its strategic objectives.
Example of KCIs for boards:
  • Rate of Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs): monitors the incidence rate of infections acquired by patients during the course of receiving healthcare treatment to assess cleanliness and infection control measures.
  • Employee Training Completion Rate: tracks the percentage of employees who have completed mandatory training on patient safety and care standards, indicating the organisation’s commitment to quality healthcare delivery.
  • Patient Information Accuracy Rate: measures the accuracy of patient information entered into healthcare systems, crucial for patient safety and care quality.
  • Medication Administration Accuracy Rate: tracks the rate of correctly administered medications to patients, reflecting the effectiveness of controls around medication dispensing and administration.
  • Health Data Breach Response Time: monitors the time taken to respond to and contain data breaches of patient information, indicating the effectiveness of information security controls.
 Information technology
  • Incident Response Time: measures the average time taken to respond to IT security incidents, reflecting the effectiveness of the IT security team in mitigating cyber threats.
  • Percentage of Systems with Up-to-date Security Patches: tracks the proportion of IT systems that are up to date with the latest security patches, reducing vulnerability to cyberattacks.
  • Patch Implementation Timeliness: monitors the speed at which software patches and updates are applied to address security vulnerabilities.
  • Frequency of Data Backup: monitors how often data backups are performed, safeguarding against data loss due to system failures or cyber attacks.
  • User Access Violation: measures the number of unauthorised access attempts to sensitive information, indicating the effectiveness of access controls and user authentication mechanisms.
  • Network Intrusion Detection Rate: measures the effectiveness of cybersecurity measures in detecting unauthorised access attempts.
  • Data Recovery Success Rate: tracks the success rate of recovering data after data loss incidents, indicating the effectiveness of data backup and recovery processes.
Selecting and monitoring KCIs involves a structured process that integrates seamlessly with the organisation’s governance and risk management frameworks:
1. Begin with a comprehensive assessment of the organisation’s risks and the controls in place to mitigate these risks. This assessment forms the basis for identifying which controls are critical and should be monitored through KCIs.
2. For each critical control, select indicators that effectively measure control performance and efficiency effectively. These indicators may relate to aspects such as compliance rates, incident frequencies or audit findings.
3. Incorporate the monitoring of KCIs into regular governance and risk management processes, ensuring that there is clear accountability for reviewing and acting on the insights provided by KCIs.
4. Recognise that the control environment is dynamic. Regularly review and update KCIs to ensure they remain relevant and aligned with the organisation’s evolving risk landscape and strategic objectives.
The strategic impact of KCIs extends far beyond compliance and control assurance. By providing a real-time view of the control environment’s effectiveness, KCIs enable organisations to navigate risks more confidently, make informed strategic decisions, and allocate resources more efficiently. In addition, KCIs contribute to building trust among stakeholders, including investors, regulators, and customers, by demonstrating a commitment to robust governance and risk management. 

The interconnectedness of KPIs, KRIs and KCIs 

The relationship between KPIs, KRIs and KCIs is dynamic and cyclical. Just as a traveller might adjust their journey based on the milestones reached, fuel levels, weather forecasts received, car service/condition reports and the functionality of their vehicle’s safety features, a board must continually monitor its performance indicators (KPIs), anticipate risks (KRIs) and ensure its controls are effective (KCIs).
This interconnectedness facilitates a responsive and adaptive approach to strategy execution and risk management. For instance, a downturn in a KPI related to customer satisfaction could trigger a review of KRIs in regard to service quality or data privacy risks. In turn, examining KCIs associated with customer service processes and data protection measures can help identify necessary improvements or preventive actions. This holistic view ensures that performance management is inherently risk-aware, and risk management is performance-oriented. 
Achieving success, whether on a journey or in achieving organisational objectives, requires continual monitoring and adaptation. Regularly reviewing KPIs ensures that the organisation remains focused on its strategic goals. Monitoring KRIs allows for the early identification of potential risks, providing the opportunity to mitigate them before they have a significant impact. Assessing the effectiveness of controls through KCIs ensures that the organisation can navigate challenges effectively, maintaining its course towards its strategic objectives.
This process of continual monitoring and adaptation fosters a culture of proactive management and resilience. It enables organisations to respond swiftly to changes in the external environment or internal performance issues, adjusting strategies and operations as necessary to remain aligned with its strategic objectives.
In addition, one of the paramount challenges faced by board directors is balancing the pursuit of short-term performance targets with the imperative of long-term organisational sustainability. Integrated indicators provide a framework for achieving this balance by offering insights into how short-term achievements align with long-term strategic goals and risk management principles.
Integrated indicators ensure that short-term performance gains do not come at the expense of long-term strategic objectives or escalate risk exposures beyond the organisation’s risk appetite. By analysing trends and patterns across KPIs, KRIs and KCIs, boards can identify practices that bolster long-term sustainability, such as investing in risk mitigation measures or enhancing internal controls.
Scenario planning and stress testing are indispensable tools for preparing organisations to face potential future challenges. Integrated KPIs, KRIs, and KCIs serve as the foundation for these exercises, enabling boards to assess how different scenarios could impact organisational performance, risk exposure, and control effectiveness. Boards can use KRIs to identify potential risks and develop scenarios around these risks, examining how they could impact KPIs and the adequacy of controls as reflected by KCIs.
Integrated indicators allow for stress testing of the organisation’s strategic plans, risk management strategies, and control frameworks against extreme but plausible scenarios, ensuring preparedness and resilience. 
Untitled (1200 x 628 px) (4)
Common challenges in implementing and integrating indicators
Aligning indicators with strategic objectives
One of the fundamental challenges is ensuring that KPIs, KRIs and KCIs are closely aligned with the organisation’s strategic objectives. Misalignment can lead to a focus on metrics that do not contribute to strategic goals, diverting resources and attention away from critical areas.
Solution: Foster close collaboration between strategic planning teams and operational teams to ensure that indicators are directly tied to strategic objectives. Regularly review and adjust these indicators to reflect shifts in strategic direction or market conditions.
Ensuring quality and availability of data
The effectiveness of KPIs, KRIs and KCIs is heavily dependent on the quality and availability of underlying data. Inconsistent, inaccurate or incomplete data can undermine the reliability of these indicators, leading to misguided decisions.
Solution: Invest in data management systems and processes that ensure the accuracy, consistency and timeliness of data. Implement regular data quality reviews and validations to identify and address data issues promptly.
Overcoming indicator overload
Boards often struggle with the proliferation of indicators, leading to information overload and analysis paralysis. Too many metrics can dilute focus, making it challenging to discern critical insights from noise.
Solution: Prioritise indicators based on their relevance to strategic objectives and risk management priorities. Adopt a less-is-more approach, focusing on a core set of KPIs, KRIs and KCIs that provide the most significant insights into performance, risks and controls. 
Integrating indicators into decision-making processes
Another challenge lies in integrating KPIs, KRIs, and KCIs into decision-making processes effectively. Failure to do so can result in these indicators being overlooked or underutilised in strategic planning and risk management.
Solution: Establish formal mechanisms for incorporating insights from KPIs, KRIs and KCIs into board and executive meetings, strategic planning sessions, and operational reviews. Train decision-makers on how to interpret and act on these indicators.
An example of a KRI board report:

Risk #

Risk Title

Risk Description

Key Causes

Key Risk Indicator

KRI Thresholds

Weekly KRI Dashboard





Day 2

Day 3

Weekly Outlook


Running of out fuel in the car

If the car runs out of fuel it will no longer be able to travel.

Not monitoring the fuel level in the car

Fuel remaining









Action plan: Last major petrol station before Mt Doom is The Shire, need to ensure tank is full before leaving The Shire.


Avoiding siloed information systems
Siloed information systems can impede the integration of KPIs, KRIs and KCIs, making it difficult to achieve a comprehensive view of organisational performance and risk exposure.
Solution: Invest in integrated technology platforms that consolidate data from across the organisation, facilitating the analysis and reporting of KPIs, KRIs and KCIs in a unified manner. 
Ensuring timeliness and relevance
The dynamic nature of business and risk landscapes requires that KPIs, KRIs and KCIs be regularly updated to remain relevant. However, organisations often struggle with maintaining the timeliness of these indicators.
Solution: Implement a structured review process for periodically assessing and updating KPIs, KRIs and KCIs based on changes in the business environment, strategic direction, and risk profile.
Understanding cultural challenges
Cultural resistance to change can hinder the effective implementation and integration of KPIs, KRIs and KCIs. This resistance may stem from a lack of understanding of the value of these indicators or fear of accountability.
Solution: Foster a culture of continual improvement and risk awareness through education, communication, and engagement. Highlight the benefits of KPIs, KRIs and KCIs in driving performance and managing risks, and recognise contributions to achieving strategic objectives.
Communicating insights to stakeholders
Communicating the insights derived from KPIs, KRIs and KCIs to stakeholders in an effective way is crucial for ensuring alignment and action. However, organisations often face challenges in presenting these insights in an accessible and actionable manner.
Solution: Develop clear, concise and engaging reporting formats that highlight key insights and recommended actions. Tailor communication strategies to different stakeholder groups to ensure relevance and impact. 
The dynamic relationship among KPIs, KRIs and KCIs represents a sophisticated management approach that integrates performance measurement, risk anticipation, and control effectiveness. This approach enables boards to navigate through complexities, adapt to changes, and pursue their strategic objectives with informed confidence. By embracing this interconnected framework, boards can ensure that their strategies are responsive, their risk management is proactive, and their controls are robust key ingredients for achieving long-term success and resilience in today’s ever-evolving business landscape. 



When you're ready here's how BoardPro can help


Start a Free Trial — run a whole board meeting cycle for free, no credit card needed. You’ll be able to create board packs in a click, and have all minutes, decisions, actions and interests in one place. Be more effective, save time, and have everyone on the same page!

Book a Demo — see BoardPro in action in this 30-minute demo, and have all your questions answered by a BoardPro specialist. You’ll get an introduction to all of BoardPro’s features — see how to set an agenda, create board packs, and take minutes. 

Attend a Free Governance Webinar — learn from our community of governance experts on subjects such as strategy, understanding board dynamics, reporting, and running effective meetings. You’ll join hundreds of others in these engaging events covering the latest governance topics.

Find a Governance Template — practical documents to make governance easy! Templates cover strategic planning, board evaluation, risk assessment, SWOT analysis, and many other essential governance and business topics to grow your organisation and adopt good governance practices. 


Click me

Get Email Notifications